The question of national identity and its reflection in the artistic vision
Ключові слова:
identity, national, cultural, character, author, literary work, symbol, mythologyАнотація
This study is devoted to the problem of national identity and the investigation of this concept in relation to fiction.
The predominance of culturological and linguoculturological approaches in the research of the national prompted an attempt to develop our own language for describing the representation of the national in literary studies.
It has been established that the national picture of the world is a mobile, dynamic formation, the components of which are formed gradually in the process of the formation of national culture and depending on the prevailing points of view on the nature of the national in society.
The special nature of the national identity of the enslaved peoples is being studied. Consequently, the subject of research in the article is national identity and its manifestation in the literary works of the Ukrainian writer Oles and the outstanding representative of Irish literature W. B. Yeats.
In the process of imposing the values of the colonial culture on the colonized peoples, such a phenomenon of national identity as dual identity was created, which became the object of our research. The phenomenon of dual identity is studied as an attempt by writers of different cultures to create a structured model of the author’s consciousness. Analysis and contextualization of literary creations of writers with a subordinate identity of vibrations, based on two key concepts: the land and the first of which symbolize one hour at a time when the creation of the creation and the vastness of the auditory the other is the cultural identity of the author and the original text. Acceptance from the іnshe movne middle-class writer- emigrant (W. .B. Yeats) has taken over his testimony of the national and cultural peculiarities of the fatherland of ancestors.
It has been established that the historical dimension of the national picture of the world allows us to consider national literature as a narrative telling about national history through events, characters, symbols, but at the same time the myth of national history exists precisely in its “imaginary” dimension, nonlinearly correlating with real historical events.
It is established that folklore-mythological and national-artistic elements, introduced in the form of reminiscences, archetypes, widespread use of traditional, national, biblical symbols (in the case of W. B. Yates it is the use of symbols of Eastern culture), are the main ways to create a national art world.
It has been proved that the identity of the authors crystallizes in the process of establishing the social and cultural norms, the glorious ideas and assessments of the economic significance and sense in the life of people. The article establishes that the specificity of the literary representation of the national is also manifested in the variety of interactions with other forms of culture: it sometimes puts forward mythologemes that are not in demand by other forms of cultural and political consciousness, sometimes creates concepts that are ready to be introduced into the mental field of the nation.
Посилання
Berryman C. (1967). W. B. Yeats : Design of Opposites . N. Y., Exposition Press, 149 p.
Ellmann, R. (1999). Yeats : The Man and the Masks. New York – London : W. W. Norton & Co., vi, 336 p.
Haskell, M. (1990) Yeats, Symons, and the Symbolist Movement. In: Yeats. An Annual of Critical and Textual Studies. Vol. VIII. / ed. by Richard J. Finneran. Ann Arbor,. pp. . 280 – 293.
Lotman, Jurij (1977). The Structure of an Artistic Text. 1‒st edition. University of Michigan press. 300 p.
Masterson, D., O’Shea E. (1985). Code Breaking and Myth Making: the Ellis‒Yeats Edition of Blake’s Works . In Yeats’s Annual, No. 3. London : Macmillan, pp. 53 – 80.
Skinner, J.( 1998) Stepmother Tongue (An Introduction to New Anglophone Fiction). Houndmills: Macmillan,. P. 237‒245.
Smith, Anthony D. (2000). The Sacred Dimension of Nationalism. Millennium, Vol. 29, No. 3, p. 790 ‒796.
Smith, A. D. (1998). Nationalism and Modernism. London, 288 p.
Zimmer, Oliver (2003). Boundary Mechanisms and Symbolic Resources: Towards a Process-Oriented Approach to National Identity. Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 173 ‒177.
Yeats, W. B. (1981). A Vision . London , Macmillan. vc. 305 p.
Антологія модерної української драми / ред. Лариса Залеська-Онишкевич [Anthology of modern Ukrainian drama / ed. Larysa Zaleska-Onyshkevych (1998). Kyiv ‒ Edmonton – Toronto]. Київ – Едмонтон – Торонто : Таксон, 1998. C. 107.
Барт Р. S/Z [Bart R. S / Z]. М., 2001. 232 с.
Бахтин М. М. Эстетика словесного творчества [Bakhtin M. M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. M. 1979. 424 с.
Блашків О. В. Подвійна ідентичність письменника у контексті проблеми структурування моделі авторської свідомості // Теорія літератури і гуманітарні студії: Збірник наукових праць з нагоди сімдесятиріччя д-ра філол. наук, проф., академіка Академії вищої школи України Романа Гром’яка / Упоряд. І. Папуша // Studia methodologica. Тернопіль : ТНПУ імені В. Гнатюка, 2012. Вип. 34. С. 63- 67.
Виноградов В. В. Проблема авторства и теория стилей [Vinogradov V. V. The problem of authorship and the theory of styles]. M., 1961. 614 с.
Жулинський М. Із забуття в безсмертя (Сторінки призабутої спадщини) [Zhulinsky M. From oblivion to immortality (Pages of forgotten heritage)]. К.: Дніпро, 1990. С. 92-97.
Історія української літератури ХХ століття : у 2 кн. : навч. підручник. Кн. 1 : 1910 – 1930-ті рр. / За ред. В. Г. Дончина. [History of Ukrainian literature of the twentieth century: in 2 books. : textbook. Book. 1: 1910 ‒ 1930s / Ed. V.G. Donchyn]. К. : Либідь, 782 c.
Йейтс У. Б. Видение: поэтическое, драматическое, магическое [Yates W. B. A Vision: poetic, dramatic, magical]. М.: Логос, 2000. 717 c.
Кавушевська Я. Особливості символістського дискурсу у слов’янських країнах // Слово і час. 2004. № 11. C. 63‒64 [Kavushevska Ya. (2004). Features of symbolist discourse in the Slavic countries. In Word and time. No.11. pp.63‒64].
Олександр Олесь. Твори: в 2-х т. [Текст] /[упор., передм. Р. Радишевського]. [Alexander Oles. (1990) Works: in 2 volumes / [emphasis, foreword of
R. Radyshevskyi]. К. : Дніпро, 1990. – T. 2 : Драматичні твори. Проза. Переклади. C. 26.
Олесь Олександр Іванович. Вибране / Упоряд. О. Бабишкін, Б. Буряк, Ю. Мельничук. К. : Рад. письменник, 1958. 518 с [Oles Alexander Ivanovych. (1958). Selected Writings. / Ed. O. Babyshkin, B. Buryak, Yu. Melnychuk. Кyiv. 518 p.].
Славинський М. Национально-государственная проблема в СССР // Київська старовина. 1993. №5. С. 99-102 [Slavynsky M. (1993). National- state problem in the USSR. In: Kyiv antiquity. No.5. P.99-102].
Сучасна літературна компаративістика: стратегії і методи / за заг. ред. Д. Наливайка. [Modern literary comparativism: strategies and methods]. К.: Видавничий дім «Киємо-Могилянська академія», 2009. 487 с.
Тишунина Н.В. Западноевропейский символизм и проблема взаимодействия искусств: опыт интермедиального анализа. Монография [Tishunina, N. V. (1998). Western European Symbolism and the Problem of Interaction of Arts: Experience of Intermediate Analysis. Monograph]. СПб : Образование, 1998. 157 c.
Хороб С. І. Українська модерна драма кінця ХІХ – початку ХХ століття (Неоромантизм, символізм, експресіонізм). [Khorob S. I.(2002). Ukrainian modern drama of the late XIX ‒ early XX century (Neo- romanticism, symbolism, expressionism)]. Івано-Франківськ: Плай, 2002. C. 248
Хорольский В. В. Культурологический метод изучения публицистического дискурса (на примере статей А. Блока, У. Б. Йейтса, О. Уайльда) [Khorolsky V.V. Culturological method of studying publicistic discourse (by the example of articles by A. Blok, W. B. Yeats, O. Wilde). [Electronic resource]. URL : http://www.relga.rsu.ru/n60/cult60.htm
Яковлев Е. Г. Искуство и мировые религии: учеб. пособие. [Yakovlev, Ye. G. (1985). Art and world religions: textbook]. М. : Высш. школа, 1985. 287 c.
